The boss of Suzuki Australia has explained why the latest Swift arrived Down Under with a sub-par safety specification that led to a one-star ANCAP safety rating, and prompted subsequent upgrades to get it to three stars.

“When we received the opportunity to have the new model Swift in Australia, we chose the specification set that was available for the Australian and New Zealand market – we took that on board not knowing there were some structural differences to the vehicle for the European market,” Michael Pachota, general manager for Suzuki Australia, told CarExpert.

“[The] European car got a three-star [Euro] NCAP safety rating, our car got one star. We then fed that back to the manufacturer, and they said “well, there is a slight specification difference in the vehicle itself”, to which point we then said “okay, that’s the car we need” – so we phased out the one-star car and brought in the three-star car.”

CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal.

When asked if that set a precedent for Suzuki Australia to demand the safest and best-performing NCAP versions of new models from now on, Mr Pachota said “definitely”.

“It wasn’t ideal. It wasn’t ideal. And yes, we did definitely strongly voice that opinion [to Suzuki HQ]. But with that said, Suzuki Motor Corporation immediately worked with us to rectify our position and future product,” Suzuki’s local boss added.

After launching in June 2024, the fourth-generation Suzuki Swift initially scored a disappointing one-star ANCAP safety rating, with physical crash testing revealing stark discrepancies in crash performance between the Australian- and New Zealand-delivered model versus the three-star rated car sold in Europe.

Key issues were noted in the frontal offset and full-width crash tests, with the local safety authority finding “higher chest loads and leg injury risk (excessive pedal movement) to the driver in the frontal offset test, and a significantly greater rear passenger chest compression measurement recorded in the full-width test which exceeded allowable limits”.